Opinion: UK PM Theresa May is no Margaret Thatcher

When judgement comes to be made on the calibre of British prime ministers of the modern era, Theresa May will be regarded as little better than a third-rate version of Margaret Thatcher.

Theresa May will be regarded as little better than a third-rate version of Margaret Thatcher, argues 1 NEWS columnist John Armstrong.
Theresa May will be regarded as little better than a third-rate version of Margaret Thatcher, argues 1 NEWS columnist John Armstrong. Source: Associated Press, Getty Images

But without the charm. Or, for that matter, the savage wit.

Or, for that matter, the sheer guts and fortitude of the one-time Dowager of Downing Street.

The pledge by the UK Prime Minister comes amid more evidence that one of the London Bridge attackers slipped through the intelligence net. Source: 1 NEWS

The Finchley Firebrand fought tooth and claw in order to do what she thought was right even when she was manifestly wrong.

Source: 1 NEWS

In stark contrast, when it came to the issue which has bedevilled the Conservative Party for decades - Britain's role in Europe - May studiously sat on the fence while her senior colleagues picked one another off in what was internecine warfare which had been long delayed.

As the smoke of battle cleared, May became leader almost by default.

It is an appalling irony that last year's Brexit referendum was turned into a blunt instrument for exacting retribution on those guilty of such self-serving behaviour.

Yet the two politicians who were most deserving of punishment - May and the chronically principle-deficient Boris Johnson - were the ones who benefited the most from the Westminster meltdown.

Unlike Thatcher, May is a prime minister not just for turning. Her U-turn on the so-called "dementia tax" shows she is for revolving at high rotation if that is necessary to save her political neck.

May's chicanery is about to have an early date with Judgement Day, however.

Thatcher maintained her iron grip on power for 11 long years. Britain's second female prime minister has yet to complete 12 short months in the job.

The general election happening in the United Kingdom overnight looks very much like marking the beginning of the end of her brief tenure in the highest office in the land.

The opinion polls have been all over the polo paddock. But they have been in agreement on one thing.

When May called the snap election some seven weeks ago, the Tories enjoyed a commanding 20-point lead over the Labour Party.

That gap has since narrowed considerably.

There is little doubt that May will win the election. But nothing short of a sweeping victory will save her. And possibly not even then.

One question will continue to nag away at her party.

If May could not wallop Jeremy Corbyn - arguably the most despised, most divisive and most mocked leader in Labour history - can her party afford to allow her to lead it into an election ever again?

What might well save her in the short-term is the need for someone to guide the country through the crisis stoked by the inroads ISIS has made both in spirit and person into the Muslim enclaves of Britain's biggest cities.

The tolerance and stoicism that prevailed in the aftermath of the Manchester suicide bombing is fast dissipating in the wake of last weekend's atrocities committed on London Bridge and its environs.

The public's patience is close to snapping. A backlash beckons. Britain's Muslim community is being asked some hard questions.

Its leaders would be wise to start coming up with some meaningful answers.

Regardless, this is not a good time to create a vacuum at the heart of Britain's government.

Anything short of an absolute rout of Corbyn will start the clock ticking on May's demise, however.

Securing such a thumping great majority to wield in forthcoming negotiations on Britain's exit from the European Union was the rationale for calling a snap election.

Few questions were asked about the political wisdom of going to the country early, however.

There was instead a collective amnesia among the politicians and pundits of the dangers.

Just ask Malcolm Turnbull. Australia's premier called an early election last year and nearly found himself chucked out of power in the process.

Calling an election on one particular issue can quickly turn into a plebiscite on something completely different.

To make things even worse, May's campaign has been a shocker and a shambles. She is viewed as aloof and out of touch.

May's expedience is epitomised by her long-time endorsement of fox hunting - a highly controversial issue in Britain.

Until the polling booths close and the votes are counted, May will have some inkling of being on the other side of that debate.

She will be a fox on the run - and not few people within her own party will deem that fate to be rather fitting.

Young NZ fur seal found with fishing line round neck is treated at Auckland Zoo

A young New Zealand fur seal is being treated for infection at Auckland Zoo after being found slumped on a rock ledge at Piha with discarded fishing line around its neck.

A young woman had spotted the injured seal and Department of Conservation rangers responded, DOC ranger Gabrielle Goodin told TVNZ1's Seven Sharp.

"Literally when we got out there I saw the seal and it was over this little rock ledge and I thought it was dead," Ms Goodin said.

Auckland Zoo vet Lydia Uddstrom said the fishing line has no give, so as the seal grows with it around the neck, the line cuts deeper and deeper.

"It's not a simple matter of cut the nylon off and just chuck him back out and good luck to you. It's really that follow up and making sure that we can control any infection," Ms Uddstrom said.

The vets work in silence, trying to keep the young seal as calm as possible while treating it at the zoo.

The case is a reminder of how a little piece of human waste can cause such pain to an innocent victim.

Fur seals are a conservation success story, with their numbers up.

But so is human interaction with them.

"We have a high population in Auckland, so it's managing that success. How can we make sure we still see a lot of seals, people are interacting with them properly and we can keep them from being injured from things like fishing lines," Ms Goodin said. 

Things are looking good for the young fur seal which has been showing improvement.

"We are hopeful that if we can get on top of this infection and everything else that's going on, he should be able to get out there where he belongs," Ms Uddstrom said.

Seven Sharp’s Lucas de Jong visited the mammal at the zoo. Source: Seven Sharp


John Armstrong's opinion: As Labour fast loses the plot, Sunday's moment of coalition unity was priceless

There’s no show without punch, and although Winston Peters did not say much, he said enough. Unlike the Prime Minister who was something of a disappointment.

Last Sunday’s carefully stage-managed display of unity by Jacinda Ardern and her deputy was not so much a case of fake news as one of fabricated news.

It was somehow befitting of the barmy politics emanating daily from the Government benches in Parliament that the coalition Government should half-celebrate its 12-month birthday having been in the job for just on 11 months.

A carefully-chosen audience was corralled on Auckland’s AUT campus to hear — or rather endure — Ardern taking close to half-an-hour to spell out her Government’s 12 priorities.

1 NEWS' Jessica Mutch and Benedict Collins give their opinions of the Acting Prime Minister who ran the country during Jacinda Ardern’s maternity leave.
Winston Peters. Source: 1 NEWS

Admittedly, it is difficult to inject excitement into a discussion of the virtues of intended alterations to the structure of the various Cabinet committees which meet weekly in the Beehive.

But one further priority would be finding a new speech writer for the Prime Minister before someone falls asleep and drowns in the verbiage. Or simply dies of boredom.

The said wordsmith's job is probably safe, however. The strict instruction from upon high would have been not to include the merest morsel of anything that those listening might find interesting — and which would detract from the whole purpose of the occasion, specifically the need for the Government to project an image as rock solid unified.

The political pantomime had one overriding objective — convincing an increasingly sceptical public that although Ardern and Peters might not always be on the same page, they are still capable of trading smiles on the same platform after 11 months of jostling one another.

While the Labour-New Zealand coalition has witnessed sporadic bouts of internal guerrilla warfare in recent times and principally on New Zealand First’s part, it is vastly over-dramatising things to suggest this so far occasional rebellion could become full-blown civil war.

So there was no chance of Peters going AWOL last Sunday. It would, however, have helped the coalition’s cause considerably had he uttered the immortal words "of course she's driving the car" during the earlier stages of the developing friction between the partners in Government. He was unwilling on Sunday to stretch the metaphor any further. But when it comes to back-seat driving or driving backwards, Peters is a master.

He has not taken on board any perceivable role as a back-room fixer for the coalition despite such a role having the capacity to alleviate some of the huge pressures weighing on Ardern’s shoulders.

He has instead exploited her inexperience as Labour’s leader and the fact that she spreads herself thin to bolster his party’s leverage within the coalition.

It is such game-play good that threatens the Government’s stability. It is not so much that the partners might clash over policy. As Ardern repeatedly notes, the coalition comprises three parties. There is always going to be disagreement over policy.

What matters is how such disputes are handled by the respective party leaderships - John Armstrong

What matters is how such disputes are handled by the respective party leaderships; whether, to use the parlance, they act on the basis of good faith and no surprises.

Ardern’s response to suggestions of disunity is to pretend there is none when she is so questioned. That is not credible.

She has now sought to brush off those claims made by her opponents by creating a distraction through repackaging her party’s priorities and relaunching them as a "coalition blueprint" under the title of Our Plan.

It would not have taken Labour’s spin-doctors long to dream up that title. It is the exact same one as used by National during the John Key-Bill English years in their similar quest to turn New Zealand into Utopia.

The only difference between Labour’s and National’s respective efforts was that Key was dismissive of such "vision documents". They might be useful in listing goals. They rarely provide detail of the means to be adopted to reach those goals. The day-to-day pressures of political life inevitably result in the prime minister of the day focusing heavily on short-term political management. Concentrating on the long-term can always be postponed to another day.

National’s various versions of vision have accordingly sunk without trace. That experience would have been a factor in Simon Bridges’ acidic observation that there was nothing in the long list of platitudes, banalities and truisms in Ardern’s blueprint which he would find hard to swallow. He isn’t wrong.

The producers of Ardern’s massive missive may have feared the same fate awaits their product as afflicted National’s equally turgid equivalent, creation.

That hurts. But Bridges is making the pertinent point that Ardern’s claim that her plan amounts to a "shared vision" of the three parties in her governing arrangement is utterly meaningless.

All it says is that the three-party grouping stretches so far across the political system that National can be accommodated with room to spare.

That makes it hard to keep the whole show on the road at the best of times.

With ministers falling like nine-pins, bureaucrats thinking nothing of splashing out $1.5 million on a justice policy summit and private consultants growing fat on the tidy sums to be made from servicing the plethora of working parties and task forces doing the work that career public servants are arguably better left to do, Labour is fast losing the plot.

But never mind. Ardern and her colleagues got what they wanted. That was a minute or two of coalition unity at the top of the six o’clock news. Given Labour’s growing malaise, that’s priceless.

The Prime Minister gave details of the Government plan during a speech in Auckland. Source: 1 NEWS


Man arrested after fatal stabbing in Upper Hutt

A man has been arrested following a man's death in Upper Hutt this afternoon after being stabbed.

Police have launched a homicide investigation.

Emergency services were called a scene on Golders Road in Upper Hutt shortly after 4:30pm and despite their best efforts to revive the victim, he was pronounced dead at the scene.

Police arrested a male nearby the scene of the assault and are currently speaking with him.

"There is not thought to be any risk to the public at this time, however the Police investigation into what happened continues," Detective Senior Sergeant Martin said.

Police car Source: 1 NEWS

The Hastings' Four Square that sold four winning first division Lotto tickets

Hastings was the lucky home to four winning first division Lotto tickets last night.

Flaxmere's Scott Drive Four Square was the winning shop and TVNZ1's Seven Sharp meet with the owner.

"We have five first division winners in Flaxmere, and we have got four of them," owner Becky Gee said.

"Usually one shop gets one but one shop got four, unbelievable."

Last night there were 40 first division winners, who each get $25,000.

Ms Gee says she doesn’t know who the winners were yet, but says hopefully she’ll find out soon.

"Hopefully it’ll go to people who need it, to pay a lot of bills."

Lotto confirmed that one person purchased four of the winning tickets, which means they take home $100,000.

It turns out Scott Drive Four Square is where to buy a winning ticket. Source: Seven Sharp