Graham Norton calls out Joseph Parker on his show, labelling him 'King of pies'

Joseph Parker has been called out by talk show host Graham Norton, who said the boxing champion would be an "easy fight" for Anthony Joshua. 

British boxer Joshua appeared on The Graham Norton Show and was interviewed about his upcoming boxing plans. 

Joshua said he was looking at fighting "either one of the two belt holders." 

"I have three of them and there are two left, one is in America and one is in New Zealand." 

As he answered, a photo of Joseph Parker appeared on the screen. 

Norton interrupted and said, "can I just say that looks like it's going to be quite an easy fight."

"It's the king of pies!

"He must be a world-class athlete, but he doesn't look like one, does he?" Norton said. 

Joshua laughed and suggested "pie" could be Parker's new nickname. 

"Shall I give him a nickname? Pie, the pie," said Joshua. 



All you need to know about Brexit, six months before the big split with EU

Confused by Brexit? Well, you're probably not alone.

1 NEWS Europe correspondent Joy Reid, who has been reporting on the issue, breaks it down. 

BREXIT – WHAT IS IT?

Brexit is a catch phrase coined for Britain leaving the EU, joining together the words “Britain” and “Exit”. That’s essentially what’s happening.

After a referendum in June 2016, the UK voted to leave the European Union (a group of 28 countries in Europe which pays membership and enjoys free trade and movement of people).

In order for it to leave, British Prime Minister Theresa May had to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty which gives both sides a two-year window to work out what a separation would look like.

She did that on the March 29 2017 – so the UK will officially leave the EU on March 29 2019 with or without a separation deal.

WHY DID THE UK VOTE TO LEAVE?

The UK essentially voted to take back control of its laws, economy and its borders.

The “Vote Leave” campaigned on concerns around some of the EU laws which the UK are subject to due to its membership and the costs of being an EU member.

ONN 1 News at 6 promo image
For more on this story, watch 1 NEWS at 6pm. Source: 1 NEWS

It said that the UK would have more money if it didn’t have to pay EU membership fees.

Immigration was also a big issue due to widespread concern about the free movement of people.

WHY’S IT SO COMPLICATED?

This is the first time a country has ever left the European Union.

Britain joined in 1973, and for the past 45 years has agreed to all sorts of laws, trade deals, rules and regulations. The question is, how to get out of them.

There’s no precedent so effectively people are making it up as they go along.

It’s being likened to unscrambling an egg… How does one do that? We’re about to find out.

WHERE ARE THINGS AT NOW?

Both sides have partly agreed on the departure deal including how much the UK will pay the EU when it leaves (39 billion pounds which is around NZ$77b).

But the terms around a future relationship is far from agreed.

Theresa May has come up with a plan called the Chequers deal, named after the Prime Minister's country retreat where it was hashed out. Essentially it proposes –

• A common rulebook on goods – avoiding friction at the UK-EU border.

• Facilitated customs arrangement – which would see the UK collect tariffs on the EU’s behalf. This would avoid a hard Irish border and remove the need for extra border checks.

• Close cooperation on services

• Close alignment on rules and laws and no free movement of people

• But the UK would maintain the freedom to make trade deals with the rest of the world.

This is NOT a final Brexit deal… but rather the Prime Minister’s wish list which the EU and UK are now negotiating on.

WHAT DOES THE EUROPEAN UNION THINK ABOUT THIS CHEQUERS DEAL?

They say frankly that “Chequers won’t work”. They don’t like big chunks of it especially around the Irish border and the economic framework.

It however acknowledges that the plan has positive elements with reference to security and foreign policy.

WHAT’S THIS ABOUT THE IRISH BORDER?

The Irish border is without a doubt the most complicated issue to solve.

The 500km border between Northern Ireland and Ireland is the only place where the UK directly meets the EU.

The question of what to do about the people and goods that cross it every single day is proving problematic.

Both sides don’t want a hard border and if border posts were to be rebuilt (which no one wants) that would break part of Good Friday agreement which brought peace to the region after decades of violence.

The EU wants a “backstop” clause which is basically an insurance policy that if an agreement can’t be reached then a fluid trade border between the north of the island of Ireland (UK) and south of the island (EU) would occur and push any customs border/ tariff checks to the ports at the Irish Sea.

But Theresa May says that will effectively split Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK and that it is unacceptable saying no prime minister would agree for Northern Ireland to be subject to different regulatory rules than the rest of the UK.

Both sides are currently at a major stand off on this.

WHAT ABOUT TRADE?

This is another biggie.

The UK sends 44 per cent of its exports to the EU and it imports 53 per cent of all imported goods from the EU. Currently this is all without tariffs.

But a new deal needs to be reached on what will happen when the UK leaves.

The closer the UK stays aligned to the EU, the harder it will be to make new trade agreements with the rest of the world, like America and New Zealand.

Again, there’s no agreement on this issue.

Commentators say the EU believes it holds most of the cards but the UK is threatening a “no deal” exit which means leaving the EU without any agreement at all on trade, which the EU will definitely want to avoid.

WHAT WOULD A “NO DEAL” ACTUALLY MEAN?

In a word – chaos. It would mean the UK leaves the European Union without formal agreement on the future between the two entities.

It would mean no “transition” period which is currently proposed.

There could be a temporary shortage of some medicines and foods which the UK gets from the EU.

There could be long queues at border ports as goods are subject to customs checks which they’ve not had before.

There could be long queues at airports and disruption to air travel.

It could see residency rights of EU citizens living in the UK and UK citizens living in the EU disappear overnight.

A no-deal would see tariffs imposed on goods going between the EU and the UK. Trade rules would revert to those set out by the World Trade Organisation which for some industries like the UK’s farming sector, it could mean tariffs of 40 per cent.

But Theresa May says it’s better the leave the EU with no deal than a bad deal.

The International Monetary Fund warns that a no-deal scenario would be the most disruptive to both economies.

All these are worst case scenarios but also possible outcomes of a “no deal”.

WHAT DOES BUSINESS THINK?

Businesses are being told to prepare for the two options, and be prepared in the event of no deal.

Big companies like Panasonic and Unilever are moving the headquarters to European cities... and many banks, such as HSBC, Lloyds and Barclays, are doing the same so they can stay under the EU's jurisdiction.

Even big companies like Airbus and BMW are looking to move parts of their operations to Europe.

There is a lot of uncertainty.

WHAT ABOUT THE DOMESTIC POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE UK? HOW DOES THAT AFFECT BREXIT?

Even if Theresa May gets a deal signed off with the EU, she then must get it approved by her Parliament.

Some say this will be an even bigger battle than securing a deal with the 27 other EU member states.

Currently there is minimal support for her Chequers deal and there is widespread condemnation from inside her party about her plan. Some say it keeps the UK too closely aligned with the EU, others say it isn’t close enough.

It’s a very divisive issue and there are real risks that Theresa May won’t have the numbers to push it through.

WHAT ABOUT A SECOND REFERENDUM?

There’s a campaign at the moment called “People’s Vote” which is calling for another referendum saying that UK voters should be given the option of leaving with the proposed deal (if there is one), or staying on current terms.

It’s well-funded, and has support from the likes of London Mayor Sadiq Khan, and even some EU leaders such as the Czech Prime Minister.

But Theresa May is adamant this is NOT going to happen. She says the people of Britain have already spoken and that Britain will exit the EU on the 29th of March.

WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN FOR KIWIS?

As no one really knows how this is going to end, it’s a bit hard to say what it will mean for New Zealand with any certainty.

However, the UK has made it clear that New Zealand will be one of the first countries it negotiates a new free trade deal with when it’s free from the European Union.

A new report also suggests it might be good news for Kiwis on their OE.

Currently it’s quite difficult to get visas to stay in the UK after the normal two-year visa period (unless you fit the stringent criteria), but the post-Brexit immigration system should make it easier for higher-skilled workers to come into, and stay in, Britain, including Kiwis.

The Migration Advisory Committee proposes no special treatment for EU nationals and no visa cap.

SO WHAT NOW?

Wait and see.

Time is running out. The EU hopes a deal will be sorted by its October summit, but it has just announced an extra one in November in case it needs more time.

Both sides are in an apparent deadlock over a number of issues with no one really knowing how this is going to end.

With just over six months to go until the UK leaves the EU, negotiations have reached a critical point. Source: Breakfast

TODAY'S
TOP STORIES

Brexit could be good news for Kiwis wanting to live and work in the UK

Brexit could be good news for New Zealanders wanting to live and work in the UK.

Negotiations are on going between Britain and the European Union with Britain due the leave the EU on March 29 next year.

Cathy Allen is a speech and language therapist who is reluctantly heading back to New Zealand after being unable to extend a visa despite Britain's National Health Service's best efforts to keep her.

"I've been trying for the last six months every month and the reason it hasn't gone through is just that there's visa caps."

But the UK Government's own advisers are now recommending the highly skilled migrant cap should be scrapped.

Ms Allen said if that happens, "It'd be a lot easier, I'd be able to stay here 3-5 years."


There are just eight weeks to work through the deadlock on key issues. Source: 1 NEWS

TODAY'S
FEATURED STORIES

Watch: Sonny Bill joins daughters in comical Rocky Balboa inspired training video for upcoming bout

Sonny Bill Williams has called in the help of his daughters, Aisha and Imman, to promote his return to the boxing ring in December, with the star posting a hilarious Rocky Balboa inspired training video on social media today.

The cross-code star will fight Australian millionaire Stu Laundy on December 1, in a charity event to fundraise money for the homeless in New Zealand and Australia.

The 33-year-old All Black posted on his Instagram account today a video of him squatting with one daughter on his arm and another on his shoulders.

He also performs sit-ups while feeding his kids in the video.

"I'm back in the ring Dec 1st - Fighting for those who happen to be a bit down on their luck and are homeless in Aotearoa and Australia. It's an honour to be part of this special event ❤️," posted Williams.

He's in line to make his Test rugby return against the Pumas in Argentina next Sunday, after three months out following a shoulder injury against France.

The cross-code star is set to step back into the ring in December in a charity event for the homeless. Source: Instagram/ sonnybillwilliams


How Finland solved its homeless crisis while numbers increase across Europe

In 2008 Finland made a significant change to their homeless policy, making it the only country in Europe where the number of homeless people has declined.

They achieved this by shutting down emergency shelters and temporary housing and instead began renovating these dwellings into apartments.

This was on top of permanent social housing they were building throughout the country under their Housing First programme.

It wasn’t an overnight success, it was a model Finland had been working on since the 1980s with charities, NGOs and volunteers.

It was the launch of a fully funded national programme a decade ago which saw the tide turn on homelessness.

“For us it means it’s always permanent housing that’s supposed to be proved for homeless persons – always permanent instead of temporary solutions,” Finland’s Housing First CEO Juha Kaakinen told 1 NEWS.

Mr Kaakinen says emergency shelters and hostels were failing to keep up with demand and were becoming an “obstacle” to solving homelessness.

“Well it’s obvious that when you are on the street or you are living in temporary accommodation to take care of things like employment issues, health and social issues it’s almost impossible,” he says.

“But a permanent home gives you a safe place where you don’t have to be afraid about what’s going to happen tomorrow, and you know if you can take care of the rent.”

In 2008, Helsinki alone had 500 bed places in emergency shelters, now 10 years later there is only one shelter with 52 beds.

Finland’s Housing First social housing stock for those who are on low incomes or in need of urgent housing makes up 13 per cent of their total housing stock.

Under their housing policy, every new housing area must be 20 per cent social housing.

“It’s quite a simple thing in a way, it makes common sense that you have to have a home like everyone else.”

The Ministry of Social Development says right now we can’t build permanent housing quick enough. Source: 1 NEWS

Not only is permanent housing supplied to those who can’t afford a roof over their head but wrap around support such as financial and debt counselling.

The number of homeless in Finland has dropped from 18,000 to 6500 people with 80 per cent living with friends and relatives while they wait for a home.

This means there is practically no street or rough sleepers in Finland, which has a total population of 5.4 million people.

The Housing First programme in New Zealand is funded by the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) across many regions including Auckland.

However, this programme is just one of a myriad of programmes that include charities and community groups.

MSD’s Deputy Chief Executive for Housing Scott Gallacher acknowledges that more housing needs to be built to address the current crisis here.

“Our optimal outcome is to have far more supply of public housing, so people can have long-term stability. The stark reality is the context in which we find ourselves in that we just cannot bring on the degree of supply of long-term housing in the time required.

“The scale of what we’ve got of transitional housing at the moment will probably reduce over time and once we have a far stronger supply of long-term homes for people that is really the optimal outcome that we’re all trying to achieve,” says Mr Gallacher told 1 NEWS.

MSD also acknowledges it needs to provide greater support for those who are homeless to end chronic homelessness.

“It’s not just about the bricks and mortar, it’s not just about the house, it’s about what sort of support are we providing families and individuals to stabilise their lives and actually be able to sustain long-term homes.”

Mr Kaakinen says there is no other way around ending homelessness but to have government involvement.

Read more from Ryan Boswell's Homeless in New Zealand series here: Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

Finland is the only European country that has seen a decline in homelessness. Source: 1 NEWS